On Sep 15, 2005, at 13:35, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Sep 15, 2005, at 13:18, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
There are no hints in the spec that indicate that the lack of an
is an error if someone uses starts-row. You can perfectly split a bag
full of cells into tables with only the starts-row or the ends-row
properties. These two properties are simply indicators to the
implementation where to split rows.
Indeed not, but the Rec does indicate that the two of them should be
I mean, for instance:
"...or alternatively fo:table-cell (one or more).
In the latter case cells are grouped into rows using the starts-row and
Note "and" not "or".