On Sep 24, 2005, at 10:39, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Sep 24, 2005, at 03:36, Manuel Mall wrote:
<snip />
Thanks for the info Manuel.
Ok then:
Instead of using hasPadding(), which tries to evaluate the specified
value, we could also provide a method hasPaddingInfo() (analogous to
the hasBorderInfo() method I added yesterday).
This method would just check if the padding is null for every side,
without doing any evaluation. It would allow the check to remain in the
FOTree --the user would get a warning *if* padding was specified, no
matter whether it ultimately evaluates to zero or not, just as a hint
that the eventual value will be ignored by layout.
Cheers,
Andreas