On Sep 24, 2005, at 10:39, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:

On Sep 24, 2005, at 03:36, Manuel Mall wrote:

<snip />

Thanks for the info Manuel.

Ok then:
Instead of using hasPadding(), which tries to evaluate the specified value, we could also provide a method hasPaddingInfo() (analogous to the hasBorderInfo() method I added yesterday).

This method would just check if the padding is null for every side, without doing any evaluation. It would allow the check to remain in the FOTree --the user would get a warning *if* padding was specified, no matter whether it ultimately evaluates to zero or not, just as a hint that the eventual value will be ignored by layout.



Cheers,

Andreas

Reply via email to