On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 05:22 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2005, at 10:39, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> > On Sep 24, 2005, at 03:36, Manuel Mall wrote:
> >> <snip />
> >
> > Thanks for the info Manuel.
>
> Ok then:
> Instead of using hasPadding(), which tries to evaluate the specified
> value, we could also provide a method hasPaddingInfo() (analogous to
> the hasBorderInfo() method I added yesterday).
>
> This method would just check if the padding is null for every side,
> without doing any evaluation. It would allow the check to remain in
> the FOTree --the user would get a warning *if* padding was specified,
> no matter whether it ultimately evaluates to zero or not, just as a
> hint that the eventual value will be ignored by layout.
>
Yes, that's certainly an option and will probably catch 90% or more of 
real life cases.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andreas

Rgds

Manuel

Reply via email to