On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 01:22 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Sep 24, 2005, at 19:09, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > > As to how to integrate this: no clear idea ATM, but I'll give it > > some thought. > > Maybe Finn or others have a few ideas to add? > > On second thought, maybe all you really need is to subclass > EnumProperty to DominantBaselineProperty, and give it three instance > variables (or an additional ScaledBaselineTable variable) > corresponding to what is referred to as the > dominant-baseline-identifier, > baseline-table and baseline-table-font-size. > > The subclass could add one (or three) additional getXXX() methods, > which would return the associated value(s). > > getValue() or getEnum() would always return the original enum value, > but the additional getters would provide access to the > scaled-baseline-table that is the result of the enum value... > > > What do you and Finn or others familiar with the fo.properties > package think about that? Would this work? >
Hmm, not sure about this one. The actual rules for computing his compound value are actually a bit involved and require information possibly not readily available to the property system. Yes, let's ask others on this list for input... > > Cheers, > > Andreas Manuel
