It is a matter of taste if one uses <base url="./"/> or <base>./</base>. Either is OK with me, but I do not like seeing it going backward and forward. Anyway, I suggest <base-url>./</base-url>.
Giving the resolution in dpi is much better. Simon On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:10:46PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm currently documenting the new configuration layout. I must say it > feels a little awkward right now. Does anybody mind if I simplify it a > little in the following way? > > Old: > <fop version="1.0"> > > <base url="./"/> > <!-- pixel to millimeter to specify dpi, 72dpi --> > <pixelToMillimeter value="0.35277777777777777778"/> > <pagesettings> > <!-- default page-height and page-width, in case > value is specified as auto --> > <pageHeight value="11in"/> > <pageWidth value="8.26in"/> > </pagesettings> > > New: > <fop version="1.0"> > > <!-- Base URL for resolving relative URLs --> > <base>./</base> > <!-- Internal resolution in dpi (dots per pixel), default: 72dpi --> > <resolution>72</resolution> > <!-- default page-height and page-width, in case > value is specified as auto --> > <default-page-settings height="11in" width="8.26in"/> > > > I think no mortal prefers pixelToMillimeter over a resolution value in > dpi. The value can easily converted to pixelToMillimeter internally. > > Jeremias Maerki > -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
