I thought about base-url, too, but given that you can also just specify a directory (which is no URL), I like the generic name better. So I left it as is ATM, but if you guys think base-url is better, no problem. Just change it.
On 24.10.2005 21:35:28 Simon Pepping wrote: > It is a matter of taste if one uses <base url="./"/> or > <base>./</base>. Either is OK with me, but I do not like seeing it > going backward and forward. Anyway, I suggest > <base-url>./</base-url>. > > Giving the resolution in dpi is much better. > > Simon > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:10:46PM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > I'm currently documenting the new configuration layout. I must say it > > feels a little awkward right now. Does anybody mind if I simplify it a > > little in the following way? > > > > Old: > > <fop version="1.0"> > > > > <base url="./"/> > > <!-- pixel to millimeter to specify dpi, 72dpi --> > > <pixelToMillimeter value="0.35277777777777777778"/> > > <pagesettings> > > <!-- default page-height and page-width, in case > > value is specified as auto --> > > <pageHeight value="11in"/> > > <pageWidth value="8.26in"/> > > </pagesettings> > > > > New: > > <fop version="1.0"> > > > > <!-- Base URL for resolving relative URLs --> > > <base>./</base> > > <!-- Internal resolution in dpi (dots per pixel), default: 72dpi --> > > <resolution>72</resolution> > > <!-- default page-height and page-width, in case > > value is specified as auto --> > > <default-page-settings height="11in" width="8.26in"/> > > > > > > I think no mortal prefers pixelToMillimeter over a resolution value in > > dpi. The value can easily converted to pixelToMillimeter internally. > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > -- > Simon Pepping > home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl Jeremias Maerki
