Manuel Mall wrote:
With respect to U+200B it says in
[snip]
It therefore surprises me that you imply U+200B may expand in justification.
The Unicode 3.0 book explicitely mentions that ZWS may be expanded for justification, to my great surprise. The 2.0 book doesn't have any remarks in this direction. I don't have access to a book more recent than 3.0. Maybe they changed mind (again...).
Thanks for that list. With respect to the issue at hand, that is which codepoints should be given to the renderers it seems there are 3 types:
...
2. Those we never give to the renderers, e.g. Soft Hyphen (its either suppressed or replaced by the proper hyphen), zero-width joiners, ...
In case of the hypothetical HTML renderer, you *want* to pass all these characters to the renderer.
Is that a sensible grouping?
Dunno. What about character composition/decomposition? J.Pietschmann
