On Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:32 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Nov 9, 2005, at 02:09, Manuel Mall wrote: > > Manuel, > <snip/> > We're (again) more in agreement than we realize, I think... Although, > now you got me wondering what you think is my 'basic sentiment' :-)
After reading your post> = yes we are once again in agreement. And don't worry about the sentiment stuff - just a minor distraction :-). <snip/> > Well, I can't find the exact reference (may be one of the earlier > posts in this thread), but I seem to remember that the ideographic > space can only shrink, not expand. Following that, I would say that > there is little difference between "suppressing" a character, and > "shrinking it to zero width". Maybe, since it needs to be shrinkable > anyway, it could be treated along that line? UAX#14 I think is the reference. <snip/> > Cheers, > > Andreas Manuel
