On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:20:09PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> A matter of definition, I guess. :-) Maybe we should really write
> [0.90alpha1] instead of [Latest] then. Care to do that? Or what do you
> prefer?

When I visit a site with software, I expect the name latest to point
to the latest stable distribution. The latest unstable distribution
could be named something like development, unstable, testing or next.

The file latest/.htaccess points to fop/0.20.5, and I think that is
best.

Simon

> On 18.11.2005 21:43:18 Simon Pepping wrote:
> > Wouldn't latest point to the stable distribution, 0.20.5?
> > 
> > Simon
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:45:59PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Author: jeremias
> > > Date: Thu Nov 17 13:45:55 2005
> > > New Revision: 345335
> > > 
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345335&view=rev
> > > Log:
> > > Changed "Trunk" to "Latest Release"/[Latest]
> > > 
> > > Modified:
> > >     xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/compliance.ihtml

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl

Reply via email to