On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:20:09PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > A matter of definition, I guess. :-) Maybe we should really write > [0.90alpha1] instead of [Latest] then. Care to do that? Or what do you > prefer?
When I visit a site with software, I expect the name latest to point to the latest stable distribution. The latest unstable distribution could be named something like development, unstable, testing or next. The file latest/.htaccess points to fop/0.20.5, and I think that is best. Simon > On 18.11.2005 21:43:18 Simon Pepping wrote: > > Wouldn't latest point to the stable distribution, 0.20.5? > > > > Simon > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:45:59PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Author: jeremias > > > Date: Thu Nov 17 13:45:55 2005 > > > New Revision: 345335 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345335&view=rev > > > Log: > > > Changed "Trunk" to "Latest Release"/[Latest] > > > > > > Modified: > > > xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/compliance.ihtml -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl