Not necessarily. We've called it 0.90alpha1. I'd assume we'd have a 0.90beta or directly a 0.90 (final) first. But I guess that's open for discussion. I don't care too much about it.
On 24.11.2005 17:56:23 Christian Geisert wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > > > Going back to SVN Trunk mode. > > [..] > > > - <property name="version" value="0.90alpha1"/> > > + <property name="version" value="0.90svn"/> > > Shouldn't this become 0.91svn? > > -- > Christian Jeremias Maerki