Not necessarily. We've called it 0.90alpha1. I'd assume we'd have a
0.90beta or directly a 0.90 (final) first. But I guess that's open for
discussion. I don't care too much about it.

On 24.11.2005 17:56:23 Christian Geisert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> 
> > Going back to SVN Trunk mode.
> 
> [..]
> 
> > -  <property name="version" value="0.90alpha1"/>
> > +  <property name="version" value="0.90svn"/>
> 
> Shouldn't this become 0.91svn?
> 
> -- 
> Christian



Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to