Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Not necessarily. We've called it 0.90alpha1. I'd assume we'd have a
> 0.90beta or directly a 0.90 (final) first. But I guess that's open for

I thought we do it like 0.91alpha2, ... 0.93 beta ... 1.0

> discussion. I don't care too much about it.

What do others think?


Reply via email to