On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 03:21 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Nov 28, 2005, at 19:56, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > > <snip /> > > Hmm... forgot to mention that running this test without an Exception > may require one of my most recent adaptations in the treatment of > fo:characters. AFAICT, remove() came down to changing the character > value to CHAR_EOT, whereas my local version actually removes excess > Characters from the parent's childNodes list, so no LM gets created > for them.
Same in the current trunk version. No LM is generated for fo:characters containing the EOT char. > > Be warned that if you run this test off the trunk, you may receive > ugly errors. Not really - if you use fop trunk to produce a PDF from that test it does it without a single error. Only the result is incorrect with repsect to the white-space handling. > > Cheers, > > Andreas Manuel
