DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38244>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38244 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-12 20:00 ------- Gerhard, I see you made the same mistake (?) in interpretation of the Rec that I initially made: the Rec states literally that "the column-number for a fo:table-column is 1 plus the column-number of the previous column", if any. IOW, it is not because the first column 'spans' two columns, that the second column has initial value 3 as column-number... What it does mean, AFAICT, is that a fo:table-cell that has column-number 1 will automatically span the first two columns, such that a following cell having 2 as column-number will cause an overlap. The code you offer for number-columns-repeated is interesting, but would fail IIC, unless the repeated column is really cloned. If not, then forceColumnNumber() --whatever that method does-- will most likely also alter the column-number of the base column (not only the repeated copy). My 0.02$ Cheers, Andreas -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
