DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38244>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38244 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-31 21:26 ------- Finaly I would say, that my point of view is not better than the current implementation. So i would propose to document the decision in the source of fo/flow/Table.java to prevent others to go the same route (based on rec 7.26.12 "number-columns-repeated") before they recognize that there is a inconsistency with 7.26.8 "column-number". Something like this (feel free to alter or shorten) if (colRepeat > 1) { //in case column is repeated: ... //there is an inconsistency for the column-number of table-column in the w3c xml-fo rec between //7.26.8 "column-number": column-number of previous table-column + 1 //and 7.26.12 "number-columns-repeated": column-number = previous + number-columns-spanned //fop developers decided to implement the behavour of 7.27.8 //see discussion on fop-dev mailing-list in 01/2006 After inserting something like that it is ok for me to close the bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
