Mostly a compliance issue. If you look at it from the XSL-1.1 POV, it's probably a bug, too. ATM, I'm unsure what to do. We probably need to verify that we understand the spec concerning the top/left properties on absolutely positioned block-containers correctly. I'm tempted to leave everything like it is for now.
On 15.01.2006 16:01:04 Manuel Mall wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:40 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Probably the "partial" indicator. Please review the following thread: > > http://www.nabble.com/Preparing-for-the-first-release---Examples-t542 > >439.html#a1461388 > > > > (especially the part where we realized that the spec changed in a > > backwards-incompatible way). At some point this will have to be > > looked at again. > > > Interesting - is this a bug or a compliance issue - I don't quite > understand? > > > On 15.01.2006 10:15:27 Manuel Mall wrote: > > > Just stumbled across this on our compliance page. For > > > block-container we say in the compliance column for 0.91 'partial' > > > but in the comment it says '[0.91 beta] No known restrictions'. > > > > > > Who is right? > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > Manuel Jeremias Maerki