Noted, but the fact that the API is not stable has been documented in [1]. We've been pushing finalizing the API before us for a long time. The old 0.20.5 API sadly doesn't fit all the requirements that we have today.
Another idea for your situation is a wrapper API that shields you from the actualy API of the FO implementation you use. I've written such a wrapper API [2] although the published version is now a little behind and would need to be updated. Furthermore, I got negative feedback from Sun about my choice of name. But if there is sufficient demand and a little help I can always revive it. I'm actively using it in my private projects. [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.91/upgrading.html [2] http://www.jeremias-maerki.ch/dev/jaxg/index.html On 07.02.2006 10:46:48 Jess Holle wrote: > Having just added reflection code to make my code work with 0.20.5 and > 0.91 beta, I'd like to see the existing Fop() constructor continue to > work as per 0.91 beta. > > Overall having to use reflection to maintain use of the current stable > while being ready for the future is at once understandable and > obnoxious. The simpler the new API is for simple cases (I'm *not* > re-using anything from one execution to the next due to the infrequency > of the calls, etc) and the sooner it stabilizes for these, the better. > I had kind of assumed that "beta" meant "API is stable for simple cases" :-) > > -- > Jess Holle > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > As part of my upcoming optimization work I want to finalize the FOP API. > > I've written down a proposal in the Wiki: > > http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ApiDesign > > > > If possible, I'd like to have that finished by the end of the week. > > Please post your feedback ASAP. > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > Jeremias Maerki
