----- original Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: RTF - list-item-label encoding (was: RTF and table/column widths (moved from fop-users)) Gesendet: Mi 01 Mär 2006 19:22:24 CET Von: "Andreas L Delmelle"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mar 1, 2006, at 08:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > You changed the Writer.write to StringBuffer operations. I'd say > > that appending to a StringBuffer is much slower than writing > > directly to a BufferedOutputStream. > > Really? Well, I have to admit, this was a late-night idea :-/ And I didn't read the TechTips for a long time: http://java.sun.com/developer/TechTips/1998/tt0120.html So String vs. StringBuffer is 1:1/6 (StringBuffer.append is six times faster or needs only a sixth than concatenating Strings). And StringBuffer.append->Writer vs. String->BufferedWriter is not mentioned that explicitly anywhere, but if both are StringBuffer-techniques, this is only two times slower. As said before, RTF is quite fast, no layout managing, that sort of thing. So not that bad at all... > > Maybe we could make sure the Writer is wrapped into a BufferedWriter > when creating it in RTFHandler, just to streamline a bit. I'll have a look at this. (I was quite busy with other stuff, but today I'll finish some FOP tasks) "Jetzt Handykosten senken mit klarmobil - 14 Ct./Min.! Hier klicken" www.klarmobil.de/index.html?pid=73025
