DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40667>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40667 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-04 12:33 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > members and not classLog I had no knowledge about). Yes, there is next step > to > do to change all other protected Loggers for LMs, but for me it would be much > easier to to if we would deal with code tagging/modules/SVN branches instead > of direct text patches. Right now I've applied Patrick's patch and to change Indeed, doing this by patches is bothersome. But as it is, the patch is a bit small and random. I would prefer it if you would make the required changes in your working copy and submit them in a patch which contains more work. Of course, I could make the changes to the LM tree myself. What do the FOP committers think: Give each LM its own logger? It will provide more clarity during debugging, but it will also increase the number of loggers considerably. Simon -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.