On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:42:40PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Dec 23, 2006, at 12:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > Seems my response to your post yesterday didn't make it to the list > for some reason...
Andreas, Your response was received but not yet processed. I try to do one thing at a time. Simon > Anyway, this known issue > > >+ <known-issue> > >+ Omitting fo:table-column or having fo:table-column without > >a column-width > >+ and attempting to create columns implicitly from the first > >+ table row is not implemented, yet (<a href="http:// > >issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35656">Bugzilla #35656</ > >a>). > >+ </known-issue> > > as Jeremias confirmed, has been resolved, for the largest part... The > testcases that were enabled with the patch solving the bug are only > basic. AFAICT, currently there is one tiny hole in the code: > > <fo:table> > <fo:table-body> > <fo:table-cell starts-row="true" width="25mm" number-columns- > spanned="2"> > ... > > The current code creates two implicit columns, but does not > distribute the cell width yet. The cell width is only used in case > the cell spans only one column. > > > > Cheers, > > Andreas > -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu
