On Monday 08 January 2007 17:20, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Interesting. You asked the same question exactly a year ago:
> http://www.nabble.com/block-container-compliance-tf920857.html

Ooops, my memory obviously doesn't extend that far back. Probably an age 

> Looks like I/we never did something about it. I'd still give the same
> answer. What would need to be done is to understand the changes in
> the spec from 1.0 to 1.1 concerning absolute positioning and area
> generation. Then this has to be expressed with testcases as the basis
> of updating the implementation. For the usual use-cases however, the
> current implementation is fine IMO.

Isn't our current compliance stated with respect to 1.0 and not 1.1? We 
still should revise the text on the page I guess.

> On 08.01.2007 05:03:32 Manuel Mall wrote:
> > On the compliance page it indicates 'partial' for block-container
> > in the 0.93 column but in the comments it says '[0.93] No known
> > restrictions.'.
> >
> > Sounds a bit like a contradiction to me. What should it be?
> >
> > Manuel
> Jeremias Maerki


Reply via email to