Hi Adrian,

Well done, in fact I was loading batik-1.5 instead of the 1.6 as I
thought.
It was an error I made when compiling the project with ant : the project
was not well refreshed and there was an old version remaining in my lib
directory. Actually, classes of Batik 1.5 were conflicting with some of
the Batik 1.6 version.

You opened my eyes with the -verbose option.

It is well running with the new JDK 6.

Thanks a lot.

Didier

On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 15:06 +0000, Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
> Hi Didier,
> 
> You could try launching Tomcat with -verbose option on your JVM to make 
> sure that the batik-awt-util.jar is being picked up.
> 
> I use JDK 1.4.2 for all my development.  Maybe your Batik libraries were 
> compiled with a different JDK than FOP and there is some 
> incompatibility.  If so you could try building your FOP and Batik jars 
> from source and testing again.
> 
> Good luck,
> 
> Adrian.
> 
> Didier Vandermaesen wrote:
> > Hello, 
> > I am writing a servlet which is generating a PDF file upon request. 
> > I am trying to include a SVG graphic in the PDF but an exception
> > occurs : 
> > Jan 23, 2007 1:40:54 PM org.apache.fop.render.AbstractRenderer renderXML
> > SEVERE: Some XML content will be ignored. Could not render XML
> > java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: KEY_AVOID_TILE_PAINTING
> > at
> > org.apache.fop.svg.PDFGraphics2D.setPrivateHints(PDFGraphics2D.java:311)
> > ...
> > 
> > I have looked in the sources of PDFGraphics2D.setPrinvateHints to see
> > why a problem can occur with the KEY_AVOID_TILE_PAINTING variable.
> > 
> > In the source, there is an import of
> > org.apache.batik.ext.awt.RenderingHintsKeyExt.
> > This package contains the static variable KEY_AVOID_TILE_PAINTING and
> > the file batik-awt-util.jar which provides it is present in my lib
> > directory. So I don't see why it isn't used correctly at run-time by the
> > PDFGraphics2D class.
> > 
> > I am using Apache Tomcat 5.5.20 - Batik 1.6 - FOP 0.93.
> > My Sun JDK is the 1.6.0 under Linux Fedora Core 6.
> > 
> > Does anyone has an idea?
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Didier Vandermaesen 
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to