I agree. Only one problem: Some semantics changed from 1.0 to 1.1
(block-container as an example). I'm not sure if we're already on 1.1
On 13.02.2007 10:51:05 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> > Guys,
> > It may be worth clarifying which version of XSL-FO we officially
> > support, now that 1.1 has reached the status of a recommendation. I
> > guess we can now take it as a reference, since it clears some
> > uncertainties of the 1.0 version. I've just noticed that I'm myself
> > still looking at the 1.0 copy whenever I want to check something.
> > So from now on, if we say "that's what is written in the nth paragraph
> > of section blah blah", do we all agree that we have the 1.1 version in
> > mind? Any objection?
> I agree, we should all be working from the 1.1 version now. As you
> already mentioned the 1.1 spec clarifies some ambiguous parts of the 1.0
> spec. Although there still remain some confusing aspects in 1.1 too!