I agree. Only one problem: Some semantics changed from 1.0 to 1.1 (block-container as an example). I'm not sure if we're already on 1.1 level everywhere.
On 13.02.2007 10:51:05 Chris Bowditch wrote: > Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > > Guys, > > > > It may be worth clarifying which version of XSL-FO we officially > > support, now that 1.1 has reached the status of a recommendation. I > > guess we can now take it as a reference, since it clears some > > uncertainties of the 1.0 version. I've just noticed that I'm myself > > still looking at the 1.0 copy whenever I want to check something. > > > > So from now on, if we say "that's what is written in the nth paragraph > > of section blah blah", do we all agree that we have the 1.1 version in > > mind? Any objection? > > I agree, we should all be working from the 1.1 version now. As you > already mentioned the 1.1 spec clarifies some ambiguous parts of the 1.0 > spec. Although there still remain some confusing aspects in 1.1 too! > > Chris > > Jeremias Maerki
