Already fixed a few seconds before you sent that message. :-)

On 09.07.2007 09:54:52 Pascal Sancho wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I get 3 errors when I buid this latest TRUNK revision.
> 
> FYI, latest rev that works is rev 554240.
> Rev 554251 fails too.
> 
> Pascal
> 
> 
>     [javac] D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:330: 
> NumberProperty(int) has protected access in 
> org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty
>     [javac]             return new NumberProperty(
>     [javac]                    ^
>     [javac] D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:357: 
> NumberProperty(int) has protected access in 
> org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty
>     [javac]                 return new 
> NumberProperty(parent.getCurrentColumnIndex());
>     [javac]                        ^
>     [javac] D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:364: 
> NumberProperty(int) has protected access in 
> org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty
>     [javac]                     p = new NumberProperty(columnIndex);
>     [javac]                         ^
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Envoyé : samedi 7 juillet 2007 03:07
> > 
> > Author: adelmelle
> > Date: Fri Jul  6 18:07:10 2007
> > New Revision: 554104
> > 
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=554104
> > Log:
> > Bugzilla 41656:
> > Refactoring in the fo package:
> > -> removal of the childNodes instance member in fop.fo.FObj 
> > addition of 
> > -> a firstChild instance member in fop.fo.FObj addition of a siblings 
> > -> instance member in fop.fo.FONode addition of a FONodeIterator 
> > -> interface in FONode + corresponding implementation in FObj changed 
> > -> implementations of FObj.addChildNode(), .removeChild() and 
> > -> .getChildNodes()
> 
> ...



Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to