Already fixed a few seconds before you sent that message. :-) On 09.07.2007 09:54:52 Pascal Sancho wrote: > Hi, > > I get 3 errors when I buid this latest TRUNK revision. > > FYI, latest rev that works is rev 554240. > Rev 554251 fails too. > > Pascal > > > [javac] D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:330: > NumberProperty(int) has protected access in > org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty > [javac] return new NumberProperty( > [javac] ^ > [javac] D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:357: > NumberProperty(int) has protected access in > org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty > [javac] return new > NumberProperty(parent.getCurrentColumnIndex()); > [javac] ^ > [javac] D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:364: > NumberProperty(int) has protected access in > org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty > [javac] p = new NumberProperty(columnIndex); > [javac] ^ > > > -----Message d'origine----- > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Envoyé : samedi 7 juillet 2007 03:07 > > > > Author: adelmelle > > Date: Fri Jul 6 18:07:10 2007 > > New Revision: 554104 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=554104 > > Log: > > Bugzilla 41656: > > Refactoring in the fo package: > > -> removal of the childNodes instance member in fop.fo.FObj > > addition of > > -> a firstChild instance member in fop.fo.FObj addition of a siblings > > -> instance member in fop.fo.FONode addition of a FONodeIterator > > -> interface in FONode + corresponding implementation in FObj changed > > -> implementations of FObj.addChildNode(), .removeChild() and > > -> .getChildNodes() > > ...
Jeremias Maerki
