Just saw it ;D

... And works fine now

Thx

Pascal

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Envoyé : lundi 9 juillet 2007 09:57
> À : fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 
> Already fixed a few seconds before you sent that message. :-)
> 
> On 09.07.2007 09:54:52 Pascal Sancho wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I get 3 errors when I buid this latest TRUNK revision.
> > 
> > FYI, latest rev that works is rev 554240.
> > Rev 554251 fails too.
> > 
> > Pascal
> > 
> > 
> >     [javac] 
> D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:33
> 0: NumberProperty(int) has protected access in 
> org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty
> >     [javac]             return new NumberProperty(
> >     [javac]                    ^
> >     [javac] 
> D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:35
> 7: NumberProperty(int) has protected access in 
> org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty
> >     [javac]                 return new 
> NumberProperty(parent.getCurrentColumnIndex());
> >     [javac]                        ^
> >     [javac] 
> D:\fop_trunk\src\java\org\apache\fop\fo\flow\TableFObj.java:36
> 4: NumberProperty(int) has protected access in 
> org.apache.fop.fo.properties.NumberProperty
> >     [javac]                     p = new NumberProperty(columnIndex);
> >     [javac]                         ^
> > 
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 
> > > samedi 7 juillet 2007 03:07
> > > 
> > > Author: adelmelle
> > > Date: Fri Jul  6 18:07:10 2007
> > > New Revision: 554104
> > > 
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=554104
> > > Log:
> > > Bugzilla 41656:
> > > Refactoring in the fo package:
> > > -> removal of the childNodes instance member in fop.fo.FObj
> > > addition of
> > > -> a firstChild instance member in fop.fo.FObj addition of a 
> > > -> siblings instance member in fop.fo.FONode addition of a 
> > > -> FONodeIterator interface in FONode + corresponding 
> implementation 
> > > -> in FObj changed implementations of FObj.addChildNode(), 
> > > -> .removeChild() and
> > > -> .getChildNodes()
> > 
> > ...
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to