Hi Andreas,
I think you are right, the current FO is not in its ancestors list.
Reading back REC 1.1/5.10.4, the default value for this function is the same 
In this case, the nearest ancestor-or-self specified property does a circular 
but the nearest ancestor specified property should not.
In extension, that should be the same thing when the function is used with an 

        -------- Message d'origine-------- 
        De: Andreas L Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Date: jeu. 20/09/2007 19:22 

        On Sep 20, 2007, at 19:19, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
        > So, my question is whether FOP or my expectation is in error here.
        > Does the self-node count as a 'closest ancestor'?
        > WDYT?
        FWIW: the fix (if necessary) is very simple, see 
        o.a.fop.fo.PropertyList.java line 191. I think the iteration needs to 
        start with the parentPropertyList instead of 'this', but I'm not 100% 


Reply via email to