Okay guys, I will try to keep those points in mind next time :) Adrian.
On 27/10/2007, Andreas L Delmelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2007, at 09:25, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > Hi > > Just would like to add a small one: > > > when applying patches from someone else I consider it important to > > list > > the contributor in a consistent way. From the CVS times, there's the > > following pattern from a commit template: > > Submitted by: Name <email> > > > > If everyone uses this template, it is possible to go through all > > commit > > messages and identify who contributed what to a software package. > > There's also a legal aspect to that. So I ask you and everone on the > > team to always use this pattern when applying patches. > > I also try to make it a policy to update status.xml with every patch > or if the change is far from trivial. That way, when the website is > re-published, the patch/change becomes visible to the outside world. > > Apart from that, I second what Jeremias already said: > > > Thanks (especially for going through unprocessed patches in the first > > place), > > > > Cheers > > Andreas > >
