I haven't saved the detailed data, sorry. I'm sure you can easily produce your own stats if you want a closer look.
I will add more detail to the Wiki indicating why I think the new approach will be faster. Jeremias Maerki On 22.11.2007 17:46:31 Adrian Cumiskey wrote: > Hi Jeremias, > > You have obviously spent quite a bit of time thinking about this, sorry if my > reply is brief, but my > first impressions are that I like the IFPainter idea. Architecturally it > looks like a really good > improvement - creating a new level of abstraction that will deal with layout > issues/details that > would otherwise have to be implemented in a subtly different way in each > implementing PrintRenderer > and at the same time providing an SVG style intermediate format that can more > easily and efficiently > plotted. > > On the negative side, I'm not sure on what/if any performance improvements we > would gain from it > though. Having said that, still an initial +1 from me :). You mention lots > of hashCode() Map > operations in the AreaTreeParser.. do you have any graphs or stats you could > share with us from > that profiling work? > > Adrian.
