I don't think you'd have much luck that way. Volunteering for building
up an up-to-date test suite would be much more helpful because that
could directly be used for compliance testing.

Jeremias Maerki



On 28.11.2007 13:41:25 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> <snip/>
> >> I’ve sent a request for clarification on xsl-editors@
> > 
> > Good idea. Due to the lack of a useful XSL test suite that is the only
> > way to improve interoperability between implementations. Some day, I'll
> > take on this task......
> 
> Makes me think of it: does anyone know why there are no more graphics in  
> the Rec illustrating some specification details (except that graphics 
> are more difficult to create and maintain than text)? That’s the first 
> thing I’m doing when trying to understand a new one.
> 
> This is like the intent behind some rules: at many places of the spec it 
> is obvious that a rule was created to achieve a specific rendering; 
> having the rendering intent together with the rule would greatly help to 
> understand that latter. I seem to remember that someone told this was 
> the case in draft pre-versions but that they were removed from the final 
> version, which is unfortunate.
> 
> Shall I submit those suggestions on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Vincent

Reply via email to