On Nov 30, 2007 2:41 PM, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
> OK.  Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is
> wrong?  (It says <groupId>org.apache.xmlgraphics</groupId> in the POM
> file for both.)

it's up to xmlgraphics project to decide how to subdivide the space
for the subprojects

> > > Second, how do I deal with the issue of the mutual dependency between
> > > FOP and Batik?  The Batik 1.7 release will depend on Fop 0.93, but in
> > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/xmlgraphics/fop/0.93/fop-0.93.pom
> > > it says that FOP 0.93 depends on the 1.6-1 versions of the various Batik
> > > artifacts.  Is that what the <exclusions> element in the POM file is
> > > used for?
> >
> > is it a real dependency or it's just that the fop pom is messed up?
> > yes, you can depend in fop and add an exclusion for batik there
> It is a real dependency.  In fact FOP can work with Batik 1.7, since
> we've maintained compatibility, but I suppose the dependency on the
> exact 1.6-1 version prevents this from working nicely.  I'll do as you
> say then and have an exclusion to prevent Batik 1.6-1 from coming in.

do you mean that fop needs batik to compile and batik needs fop?
chicken and egg problem? how do you do that?

> What's the difference?  Artifacts in the m1-… directory can be used by
> both Maven 1 and 2, but those in the m2-… directory can only be used by
> Maven 2?  (/me is a bit clueless about the difference between Maven 1
> and 2).

there's no difference, whether you deploy to the m1 or m2 repos it
will be available for both m1 and m2 users. So only deploy to one of

> Thanks,
> Cameron
> --
> Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/
>         xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ▪  ICQ 26955922  ▪  MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
                             -- The Princess Bride

Reply via email to