Carlos Sanchez: > > > groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
Cameron McCormack: > > OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is > > wrong? (It says <groupId>org.apache.xmlgraphics</groupId> in the POM > > file for both.) > Carlos Sanchez: > it's up to xmlgraphics project to decide how to subdivide the space > for the subprojects OK. (Jeremias and others, any opinion here? Unless there’s any issue with it, I’ll choose org.apache.xmlgraphics as the groupId, to keep it consistent.) > > [mutual dependency with fop and batik] > do you mean that fop needs batik to compile and batik needs fop? > chicken and egg problem? how do you do that? Well, it’s not quite true. Batik has an optional run-time dependency on a pdf-transcoder.jar file that can be built from FOP. That pdf-transcoder has a compile-time dependency on Batik. We deal with it by having a copy of FOP’s pdf-transcoder.jar in Batik’s repository and a copy of Batik’s jar in FOP’s repository. At some point some disentaglement will be done by moving some stuff to xmlgraphics commons… > > What's the difference? Artifacts in the m1-… directory can be used by > > both Maven 1 and 2, but those in the m2-… directory can only be used by > > Maven 2? (/me is a bit clueless about the difference between Maven 1 > > and 2). > > there's no difference, whether you deploy to the m1 or m2 repos it > will be available for both m1 and m2 users. So only deploy to one of > them. OK. Thanks, -- Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
