Hi Jeremias

Thanks for considering my patch, and sorry for the delay in responding.

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason, would you mind attaching your patch to a new Bugzilla issue [1]?

Done - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44737

>  This is to establish that you agree to republish your changes under the
>  ALv2.0, especially since the location of the current patch generally
>  contains code published under the GPL. Explicitely stating this in the
>  Bugzilla issue would be a nice bonus.

Done

>
>  I will then take a closer look at your patch. However, I'd prefer not to
>  add the Panose class taken from FOray unless Victor explicitely donates
>  it to the FOP project like he did for other code on prior occasions. I
>  don't like to mix external source classes with our own if it can be
>  avoided. Without integrating the Panose functionality with our font
>  substitution code, it has little use for us anyway.

Understood.  I have been working a little with Victor on FOray's
Panose class, but for now, rather than ask him to consider explicitly
donating it, I have removed it from the patch (given, as you note,
that it is of little use to FOP by itself).

>  Furthermore, would you please:
>  - remove the generics from the patch before uploading the patch file as
>  we're still on Java 1.4?

Done

>  - make sure you follow all the sections (especially section 4,
>  redistribution) of the ALv2 when you get to a point where you do
>  releases of docx4j?

Will do.

kind regards

Jason

Reply via email to