Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 18.04.2008 13:01:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
>> - invalid param usage: use -param <name> <value>
>> - you must specify the number of copies
>> - the USAGE messages
> These are part of the command-line interface which must interface with
> System.out/err. The user doesn't even have a chance to register an event
> listener in this case.

Nevertheless, they deserve to be localized as for the other messages. Is
that doable?

>> - value must be a positive integer
> That's the only debatable one. I opted not to consider it, at least for
> the moment. 80:20 rule. I want to gather some feedback on the feedback
> stuff before I invest so much more time in less important parts.

Fair enough.

> However, if you want to tackle those....
>> And probably others.
>>> On 18.04.2008 11:28:48 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>>>> Hi Jeremias,
>>>> why don't you use the new processing feedback mechanism for the
>>>> notifications we can find in the code below?


Vincent Hennebert                            Anyware Technologies
Apache FOP Committer                         FOP Development/Consulting

Reply via email to