Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 18.04.2008 13:01:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote: >> Jeremias Maerki wrote: >>> Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones. >> - invalid param usage: use -param <name> <value> >> - you must specify the number of copies >> - the USAGE messages > > These are part of the command-line interface which must interface with > System.out/err. The user doesn't even have a chance to register an event > listener in this case.
Nevertheless, they deserve to be localized as for the other messages. Is that doable? >> - value must be a positive integer > > That's the only debatable one. I opted not to consider it, at least for > the moment. 80:20 rule. I want to gather some feedback on the feedback > stuff before I invest so much more time in less important parts. Fair enough. > However, if you want to tackle those.... > >> And probably others. >> >>> On 18.04.2008 11:28:48 Vincent Hennebert wrote: >>>> Hi Jeremias, >>>> >>>> why don't you use the new processing feedback mechanism for the >>>> notifications we can find in the code below? Vincent -- Vincent Hennebert Anyware Technologies http://people.apache.org/~vhennebert http://www.anyware-tech.com Apache FOP Committer FOP Development/Consulting
