https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #40 from Andreas L. Delmelle <adelme...@apache.org> 2009-08-19 13:20:20 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=24152) small FO demonstrating the remaining problem Added this attachment to demonstrate the one remaining issue I was looking into. It is not restricted to the page-keep being nested, but is a general problem with keep-within.page in multi-column flows. The changes break no testcases, since our current tests only check for behavior in single column documents, where the issue does not exist. So, it could be argued that the changes are ready to be committed to Trunk, since it does offer increased functionality. I propose to add the newly attached file as a disabled testcase to remind us of what does not work, but apart from that...? Anyone against? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.