Note that pages 0.94/upgrading.xml and 0.95/upgrading.xml talk about
versions 0.94 and 0.95, even though the page calls it the latest
version. I think it is not correct to talk about FO 1.1 here, because
at the time of the releases FO 1.1 was not really considered. These
pages are as they were included in those releases, and therefore I
think they should not be updated at all except for glaring errors.

Simon

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:37:51PM -0000, psan...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: psancho
> Date: Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
> New Revision: 911800
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911800&view=rev
> Log:
> Fop WebSite: XSL-FO 1.0 references were still there; fixed now
> 
> Modified:
>     xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
>     xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml
>     xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml
> 
> Modified: 
> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml
> URL: 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml?rev=911800&r1=911799&r2=911800&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml 
> (original)
> +++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml 
> Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>      <section id="important">
>        <title>Important!</title>
>        <p>
> -        If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a 
> few very important things 
> +        If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a 
> few very important things
>          to consider:
>        </p>
>        <ul>
> @@ -63,21 +63,21 @@
>          </li>
>          <li>
>            <p>
> -            The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the 
> XSL-FO 1.0 specification.
> +            The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of the 
> XSL-FO 1.1 specification.
>              Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to produce 
> warnings or even errors
>              now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in 
> the new code.
>            </p>

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu

Reply via email to