Hi, I partially agree, but...: - both releases (0.94: 2007, 0.95: 2008) are posterior to REC 1.1 (2006); - both releases implement some REC 1.1 new features (Cf. bookmarks).
I can revert the change, but that will not reflect the above things, IMHO. WDYT? -- Pascal Simon Pepping a écrit : > Note that pages 0.94/upgrading.xml and 0.95/upgrading.xml talk about > versions 0.94 and 0.95, even though the page calls it the latest > version. I think it is not correct to talk about FO 1.1 here, because > at the time of the releases FO 1.1 was not really considered. These > pages are as they were included in those releases, and therefore I > think they should not be updated at all except for glaring errors. > > Simon > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:37:51PM -0000, psan...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: psancho >> Date: Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010 >> New Revision: 911800 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911800&view=rev >> Log: >> Fop WebSite: XSL-FO 1.0 references were still there; fixed now >> >> Modified: >> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml >> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.95/upgrading.xml >> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/trunk/upgrading.xml >> >> Modified: >> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml?rev=911800&r1=911799&r2=911800&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml >> (original) >> +++ xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/0.94/upgrading.xml >> Fri Feb 19 12:37:51 2010 >> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ >> <section id="important"> >> <title>Important!</title> >> <p> >> - If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a >> few very important things >> + If you're planning to upgrade to the latest FOP version there are a >> few very important things >> to consider: >> </p> >> <ul> >> @@ -63,21 +63,21 @@ >> </li> >> <li> >> <p> >> - The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of >> the XSL-FO 1.0 specification. >> + The new code is much more strict about the interpretation of >> the XSL-FO 1.1 specification. >> Things that worked fine in version 0.20.5 might start to >> produce warnings or even errors >> now. FOP 0.20.5 contains many bugs which have been corrected in >> the new code. >> </p> >> >