On 09/03/11 07:51, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 08.03.2011 20:31:54 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> On 05/03/11 12:06, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> On 04.03.2011 16:06:30 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>>>> On 03/03/11 12:44, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>>>> Finally, after over a week changing things and waiting a day for the
>>>>> next build, the full test suite (minus hyphenation)
>>>> Just curious: why no hyphenation?
>>> Mostly because that requires the OFFO hyphenation JAR. I just wanted to
>>> get Gump to run the FOP tests, too, so we have more timely feedback if
>>> something breaks.
>> Is the OFFO hyphenation jar not there because of licensing issues?
> Yes, we moved all hyphenation pattern out of FOP years ago because of
> that. We couldn't be sure that we can make all hyphenation patterns
> comply to the ASF license policy.

I know that, my question was whether we would break any license if we’d
put that jar in Gump to run the hyphenation tests as well? IIC we
wouldn’t be distributing anything by doing that.

>>>>> is running in Gump
>>>>> and passes under OpenJDK. It also uncovered a headless exception in
>>>>> Batik which is now fixed.
>>>>> http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/xml-fop/index.html
>>>>> So, when next time there is a message like this, we really have a
>>>>> problem in the sources.
>>>> Thanks Jeremias,
>>>> Vincent
>>>> <snip/>
>>> Jeremias Maerki
>> Vincent
> Jeremias Maerki


Reply via email to