On 09.03.2011 17:05:19 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> On 09/03/11 07:51, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 08.03.2011 20:31:54 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >> On 05/03/11 12:06, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>> On 04.03.2011 16:06:30 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >>>> On 03/03/11 12:44, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>>>> Finally, after over a week changing things and waiting a day for the
> >>>>> next build, the full test suite (minus hyphenation)
> >>>>
> >>>> Just curious: why no hyphenation?
> >>>
> >>> Mostly because that requires the OFFO hyphenation JAR. I just wanted to
> >>> get Gump to run the FOP tests, too, so we have more timely feedback if
> >>> something breaks.
> >>
> >> Is the OFFO hyphenation jar not there because of licensing issues?
> > 
> > Yes, we moved all hyphenation pattern out of FOP years ago because of
> > that. We couldn't be sure that we can make all hyphenation patterns
> > comply to the ASF license policy.
> 
> I know that, my question was whether we would break any license if we’d
> put that jar in Gump to run the hyphenation tests as well? IIC we
> wouldn’t be distributing anything by doing that.

Sorry, I misunderstood you. I guess we could set up OFFO as an external
project, let the OFFO JAR build in there and add it as a dependency on
FOP inside Gump. I don't think that this would create any licensing
problems.

> 
> >>>>> is running in Gump
> >>>>> and passes under OpenJDK. It also uncovered a headless exception in
> >>>>> Batik which is now fixed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/xml-fop/index.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, when next time there is a message like this, we really have a
> >>>>> problem in the sources.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Jeremias,
> >>>> Vincent
> >>>>
> >>>> <snip/>
> >>>
> >>> Jeremias Maerki
> >>
> >>
> >> Vincent
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremias Maerki
> 
> 
> Vincent




Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to