On 09.03.2011 17:05:19 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > On 09/03/11 07:51, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > On 08.03.2011 20:31:54 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > >> On 05/03/11 12:06, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > >>> On 04.03.2011 16:06:30 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > >>>> On 03/03/11 12:44, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > >>>>> Finally, after over a week changing things and waiting a day for the > >>>>> next build, the full test suite (minus hyphenation) > >>>> > >>>> Just curious: why no hyphenation? > >>> > >>> Mostly because that requires the OFFO hyphenation JAR. I just wanted to > >>> get Gump to run the FOP tests, too, so we have more timely feedback if > >>> something breaks. > >> > >> Is the OFFO hyphenation jar not there because of licensing issues? > > > > Yes, we moved all hyphenation pattern out of FOP years ago because of > > that. We couldn't be sure that we can make all hyphenation patterns > > comply to the ASF license policy. > > I know that, my question was whether we would break any license if wed > put that jar in Gump to run the hyphenation tests as well? IIC we > wouldnt be distributing anything by doing that.
Sorry, I misunderstood you. I guess we could set up OFFO as an external project, let the OFFO JAR build in there and add it as a dependency on FOP inside Gump. I don't think that this would create any licensing problems. > > >>>>> is running in Gump > >>>>> and passes under OpenJDK. It also uncovered a headless exception in > >>>>> Batik which is now fixed. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/xml-fop/index.html > >>>>> > >>>>> So, when next time there is a message like this, we really have a > >>>>> problem in the sources. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks Jeremias, > >>>> Vincent > >>>> > >>>> <snip/> > >>> > >>> Jeremias Maerki > >> > >> > >> Vincent > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > Vincent Jeremias Maerki
