On 24/01/12 11:16, Chris Bowditch wrote:
> On 23/01/2012 22:41, J.Pietschmann wrote:
>> Hi Mehdi!
> Hi Joerg, Mehdi,
>> Am 23.01.2012 17:15, schrieb me...@apache.org:
>>> This breaks the public API but for good reasons:
>> Good reasons or not, there are a few guidelines when it comes
>> to changing public interfaces:
>> - There has to be a discussion of the change. Alternatively,
>>    open a bugzilla ticket and provide reasons and the proposed
>>    solution/patch for inspection (yes, even committers should
>>    do that)
>> - It's good practice to call a vote after the pros and cons
>>    of the change have been laid out.
>> - It's also good practice to deprecate functionality which is
>>    going to be removed, in order to maintain compatibility for
>>    at least one release cycle and give users time to adapt.
>> Please revert the commit.
> I agree this should have been discussed before it was committed. Mehdi has now
> reverted the change and put the changes into a patch. Most of the Java code in
> FOP has a public modifier, but that in my view does not mean it is part of the
> public API for embedding FOP. I think we need a clearer definition of what is
> part of the public API and what is not and we should document this.

I would consider to be part of the public API the code that is present
on the following page:

> Thanks,
> Chris
>> J.Pietschmann


Reply via email to