https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
Pascal Sancho <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from Pascal Sancho <[email protected]> 2012-02-09 09:47:05 UTC --- I tried your XSL-FO against FOP 1.0 and trunk I tried to display both your XEP and FOP attachments. I use Adobe viewer 9. What I get depends mainly on Adobe viewer configuration: when disabling all display options: FOP output gives me expected result (all borders have same width) XEP output gives wrong result on: - table left-border (double width) - cells R5C2 & R5C5 bottom-border (double width) - 4th col right-border (double width) When enabling 2D acceleration, in both cases (XEP and FOP) borders appears thinner than previous test. In both cases also: displayed border width depend on adjacent cell content: XEP: horizontal borders are affected FOP: vertical borders are affected When printing, output depend on border width (0.1pt, 1pt) and printer configuration: 300dpi give bad result (missing some borders with both FOP & XEP), while 1200dpi give expected result (with 1pt border, not tried with XEP) I've not tried XEP with 1pt, but I'm sure it will be OK. So, from what I can see, results are device dependant. It is difficult to figure what you get without further details, and more appropriate test case: 0.1pt is definitively to small (even with a 1200dpi printer, a border may be displayed with a width of 1 or 2 dips, depending where it start). A more precise description will be welcome, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
