benson, thanks for that clarification, i see in [1] that though an ICLA is not required of a contributor, it is nevertheless desirable to have one submitted; so, Alexios, if you wish to submit an ICLA please do so; however, given the limited scope of the patch, I would agree that it is not strictly required, and the lack of one should not impede applying the patch
glenn [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]>wrote: > an icla is not required for a patch attached to a bz unless it is of > unusual size or not coded be the bz submitter. > > > On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Glenn Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > > I support committing this patch, however I don't see an ICLA listed at [1] > for Alexios. Alexios, if you have not submitted an ICLA [2], please do so. > > I would be happy to apply the patch (if Mehdi doesn't have the time). > > [1] http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas > [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt > >
