Thank you all for your replies. I just printed and will send the ICLA anyway so 
that it will not be an impediment for applying this or future patches.

@Vincent  I will be happy to make any clarification related to the patch. But 
it would be transparent if there is a comment on the issue or an email at any 
FOP mailing list so that I can get feedback.

Alexios Giotis

On Feb 28, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:

> benson, thanks for that clarification, i see in [1] that though an ICLA is 
> not required of a contributor, it is nevertheless desirable to have one 
> submitted; so, Alexios, if you wish to submit an ICLA please do so; however, 
> given the limited scope of the patch, I would agree that it is not strictly 
> required, and the lack of one should not impede applying the patch
> glenn
> [1]
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Benson Margulies <> 
> wrote:
> an icla is not required for a patch attached to a bz unless it is of unusual 
> size or not coded be the bz submitter.
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Glenn Adams <> wrote:
>> I support committing this patch, however I don't see an ICLA listed at [1] 
>> for Alexios. Alexios, if you have not submitted an ICLA [2], please do so.
>> I would be happy to apply the patch (if Mehdi doesn't have the time).
>> [1]
>> [2]

Reply via email to