https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51484
--- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams <gad...@apache.org> 2012-04-24 05:44:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Created attachment 27708 [details] > > Hack for RtfSection.java > > > > The RTF spec seems to say that FOP is right here and OpenOffice is > > wrong, see <http://www.biblioscape.com/rtf15_spec.htm#Heading27>. > > It's also worth linking here to the corresponding bug report for > > LibreOffice, <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39001>. > > > > OTOH the attached patch seems to fix the problem for me, I have not > > tested it thoroughly yet, though. > > could you provide additional input showing that the proposed fix is adequate > to > address this problem, doesn't introduce regressions, etc.? Roger/Benjamin, I am still awaiting your input as requested above. if I see no further input by April 30, I will close this bug due to lack of requested information. Regards, Glenn -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
