--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Riefenstahl <> 2012-04-25 
08:16:59 UTC ---
> Roger/Benjamin, I am still awaiting your input as requested
> above.

Sorry for not answering this earlier.

>> could you provide additional input showing that the proposed fix is
>> adequate to address this problem, doesn't introduce regressions,
>> etc.?

The short answer is, I can't.

At the time I looked at the source, found a spot that seemed
reasonable to fix the bug and gave you the patch.  I am really not
very knowledgeable in the library, in the RTF spec or in the usage of
RTF in the wild.  So no, I can't judge if this is a correct fix in

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to