> <snip/> > Let me insist on that one. The inconsistency is actually introduced by > Fop classes. Before the merge there were 14 classes having FOP in their > names, vs 6 having Fop. Also, the product name is FOP, not Fop, and that > should be reflected in the class names. > > I still don't agree, it's not about the number of classes but rather the > importance and location of those classes; FopFactory.java, Fop.java. If you > feel very strongly about it, feel free to change it, I won't oppose it, but > when someone thinks "wtf!!! Why are there so many different ways to write > FOP!?!?!" and they do an svn blame, I don't want my name anywhere near it.
I agree with Mehdi. Besides the importance of the classes using Fop*, a quote from the Joshua's Bloch Effective Java, 2nd edition: "Which class name would you rather see, HTTPURL or HttpUrl ? " BTW, congratulations for this work, it will definitely help me. Alexios Giotis