On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Chris Bowditch

> On 29/09/2012 08:07, Glenn Adams wrote:
>  My issue is our assigning a standard semantics to an XSL-FO property that
>> is absent of standard semantics. I would prefer we use a new, fox namespace
>> attribute.
> I believe Vincent did decide to use fox:header attribute in the end as
> suggested by Pascal. Use role and an fox attribute seemed overcomplicated
> and Pascal's suggestion was a good one.

In that case (not using role attribute), please proceed, and thanks for the
good work Vincent!

Reply via email to