yes, and why is that a problem? On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Francesco Nigro <[email protected]>wrote:
> but in this way the fonts will be embedded as multi-byte, won't they? > > ------------------------------ > *Da:* Glenn Adams <[email protected]> > *A:* [email protected]; Francesco Nigro <[email protected]> > > *Inviato:* Giovedì 11 Aprile 2013 16:51 > *Oggetto:* Re: embedding fonts subset with single-byte encoding > > Convert them to multibyte and let the existing subset system work. > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Francesco Nigro <[email protected]>wrote: > > Hi all, > I'm using a peculiar archiving solution so I have to use single-byte > encoded fonts; I'd like to reduce size and embed only a subset and not all > fonts. > I know that FOP doesn't support subset for single-byte at the moment but I > was wondering if it would be feasible/reasonable to implement this feature. > I saw that getTTCName and getUsedGlyphs methods are called inside > PDFFactory class to create a subset and that those methods are implemented > for MultiByteFont class only. > > Is fop going to support it at some point in the future? > What do you think would be the shortest path to have subset for > single-byte fonts? > > Thanks in advance, > F. > > > > >
