yes, and why is that a problem?

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Francesco Nigro <fixitf3...@yahoo.it>wrote:

> but in this way the fonts will be embedded as multi-byte, won't they?
>
>   ------------------------------
>  *Da:* Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>
> *A:* fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org; Francesco Nigro <fixitf3...@yahoo.it>
>
> *Inviato:* Giovedì 11 Aprile 2013 16:51
> *Oggetto:* Re: embedding fonts subset with single-byte encoding
>
> Convert them to multibyte and let the existing subset system work.
>
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Francesco Nigro <fixitf3...@yahoo.it>wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm using a peculiar archiving solution so I have to use single-byte
> encoded fonts; I'd like to reduce size and embed only a subset and not all
> fonts.
> I know that FOP doesn't support subset for single-byte at the moment but I
> was wondering if it would be feasible/reasonable to implement this feature.
> I saw that getTTCName and getUsedGlyphs methods are called inside
> PDFFactory class to create a subset and that those methods are implemented
> for MultiByteFont class only.
>
> Is fop going to support it at some point in the future?
> What do you think would be the shortest path to have subset for
> single-byte fonts?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> F.
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to