it's just that I have to use an archiving system that doesn't allow multi-byte fonts; I know that's crazy but nonetheless I have to use it...
So I need to find a way to implement embedding-mode=subset AND encoding-mode=single-byte. ________________________________ Da: Glenn Adams <[email protected]> A: [email protected]; Francesco Nigro <[email protected]> Inviato: Sabato 13 Aprile 2013 2:00 Oggetto: Re: embedding fonts subset with single-byte encoding yes, and why is that a problem? On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Francesco Nigro <[email protected]> wrote: but in this way the fonts will be embedded as multi-byte, won't they? > > > > >________________________________ > Da: Glenn Adams <[email protected]> >A: [email protected]; Francesco Nigro <[email protected]> >Inviato: Giovedì 11 Aprile 2013 16:51 >Oggetto: Re: embedding fonts subset with single-byte encoding > > > >Convert them to multibyte and let the existing subset system work. > > >On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Francesco Nigro <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi all, >>I'm using a peculiar archiving solution so I have to use single-byte encoded >>fonts; I'd like to reduce size and embed only a subset and not all fonts. >> >>I know that FOP doesn't support subset for single-byte at the moment but I >>was wondering if it would be feasible/reasonable to implement this feature. >>I saw that getTTCName and getUsedGlyphs methods are called inside PDFFactory >>class to create a subset and that those methods are implemented for >>MultiByteFont class only. >> >> >>Is fop going to support it at some point in the future? >>What do you think would be the shortest path to have subset for single-byte >>fonts? >> >> >>Thanks in advance, >>F. >> > > >
