Can you explain what you expected? The performance results really depend on the example you use. For instance, images can make a big difference, and depending on the type of image and the format output FOP may use a native or non native image loader which may result in significant performance differences.

On 3/17/14, 9:48 PM, Gonzalo Vasquez wrote:
Hi everybody,

We've been doing some performance tests using several output formats (PDF, PostScript and AFP), and they al give us about the same time results, which are far from what we expected. I'm aware that there are several bits of Apache FOP which might me tweaked, but any suggestions would be appreciated for improving performance.


Regards,
Gonzalo Vásquez Sáez
Gerente Investigación y Desarrollo (R&D)
Altiuz Soluciones Tecnológicas de Negocios Ltda.
Av. Nueva Tajamar 555 Of. 802, Las Condes - CP 7550099
+56 2 335 2461
gvasq...@altiuz.cl <mailto:gvasq...@altiuz.cl>
http://www.altiuz.cl <https://app.getsignals.com/link?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.altiuz.cl&ukey=agxzfnNpZ25hbHNjcnhyGAsSC1VzZXJQcm9maWxlGICAgIKG17MKDA&k=3844567E-7157-4BD8-BB5C-BD3FCE2B471B> http://www.altiuzreports.com <https://app.getsignals.com/link?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.altiuzreports.com&ukey=agxzfnNpZ25hbHNjcnhyGAsSC1VzZXJQcm9maWxlGICAgIKG17MKDA&k=22371E1B-E394-4EAD-A2DD-91E7478829A0>
        
<https://app.getsignals.com/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Faltiuz&ukey=agxzfnNpZ25hbHNjcnhyGAsSC1VzZXJQcm9maWxlGICAgIKG17MKDA&k=A79194AD-F0D8-4482-9ACB-553D66D77F86>
 
<https://app.getsignals.com/link?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Faltiuz&ukey=agxzfnNpZ25hbHNjcnhyGAsSC1VzZXJQcm9maWxlGICAgIKG17MKDA&k=3504203A-F7BE-4C3D-8470-78F85091814E>
 
<https://app.getsignals.com/link?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fcompany%2Faltiuz&ukey=agxzfnNpZ25hbHNjcnhyGAsSC1VzZXJQcm9maWxlGICAgIKG17MKDA&k=D7F4C277-E804-46AA-B3F1-0F481F95BFDB>

        



Reply via email to