in that case, +1 from me

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Includes layout tests.
>
>
> On 11/25/14, 5:14 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
> What are your plans for testing? I haven't looked, but does your branch
> include new unit tests for this feature?
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Luis Bernardo <lmpmberna...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I would like to merge the branch branches/Temp_BasicSideFloats to trunk.
>> The branch has a implementation of side floats that uses the same approach
>> used when handling change in IPD across pages.
>>
>>  These are the known limitations:
>> -- the "clear" fo:float attribute is ignored; only the float attribute
>> (left or right) is used
>>  -- overlapping of floats in the Y is not handled (even in the case
>> there would not be overlap in the X direction)
>>  -- floats that extend beyond the body region are not properly handled
>> and will overflow past the edge of the region
>>  -- if a float extends to bottom of the body region and there are
>> footnotes in the page the float may overlap with the footnote region
>> -- floats next to a table are not supported unless the start and end of
>> the table happens in between the start and end of the float
>>
>>  Examples can be found in the thread with subject "RFC: basic side
>> floats" in this mailing list.
>>
>>  To follow due process and since this will be a new major feature I am
>> launching a vote.
>>
>>  Please vote or report a bug before the end of Monday UTC, December 1st.
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to