Firstly, the AT (area tree) output format is really only used for testing
these days. You should be looking at the IF (intermediate format) output
format, which presently drives all the rendering modules.
Whether a proposed patch is accepted or not depends a great deal on its
quality, appropriateness, completeness (e.g., whether testing is included),
and architectural soundness. If it fails these in a significant way, it
would likely not be accepted into trunk.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Jan Tosovsky <j.tosov...@email.cz> wrote:
> Dear All,
> when implementing change bars I encountered problem with proper storing the
> change bar info using the current Area Tree vocabulary:
> Is it Ok to extend the curent element set? Can I propose a patch or does
> changes to Area Tree need any approval in advance?